Skip to main content
Online evaluation scores traffic as it happens: every checked trace is evaluated the moment it arrives, with no dataset and no separate run. Unlike offline evaluation, there is no ground truth here - nobody wrote an expected answer for a live user’s question - so verdicts come from LLM-as-judge scoring and deterministic detectors running against real production behavior, exactly where your users experience it. In the dashboard this is the Monitor tab. When it finds something, the finding loops back: a bad trace becomes an offline dataset case in one click, so today’s production failure is tomorrow’s regression test. Doing it well:
  • Score the behaviors that hurt in production. Online evaluators run judge criteria (faithfulness, tool accuracy, goal completion) against sampled live traces and whole sessions; patterns catch the deterministic failures (errors, empty responses, PII, latency) at zero LLM cost.
  • Tune the sample rate to your volume. Every judged trace is a real LLM call - start at sample_rate=1.0 while traffic is small and you’re validating criteria, then dial down as volume grows. Deterministic patterns stay at 100%: they’re free.
  • Let users vote. End-user feedback (client.feedback.report) is the cheapest evaluation signal you’ll ever get - a downvote raises a signal directly, and real-world outcomes measure how often your judges agreed with reality.
  • Feed findings back into offline tests. Low-scoring traces (and suspiciously perfect ones) become dataset cases - the online/offline loop is what makes both sides better.
Monitor is AgentX’s automatic quality monitoring for production traffic. Every checked trace is evaluated against a set of detectors, and a match becomes a signal: a deduped, triage-ready record readable from the dashboard (Governance > Monitor) or straight from the SDK via client.monitor.signals. A pattern is a detection rule with a real id, the same way a dataset or an evaluation config has one. Build a pattern once with client.monitor.patterns.builder(...).publish(), then reference it by id, or rely on the built-in checks and any patterns your workspace has defined in the dashboard. This works the same way for an agent built natively in AgentX and for an external agent traced entirely through the Python SDK.

Two ways to trigger it

They can be combined; neither requires changes to how you already call tracer.trace(...) beyond the flags described below.

Trace-time: monitor and pattern_ids

Pass monitor=True on tracer.trace(...) to check that specific trace immediately, with no dashboard setup at all. pattern_ids restricts detection to exactly those patterns; omit it to run the full default sweep (built-in checks plus every active pattern) instead. monitor=False is the opposite: it opts that trace out of every ingest-time check - patterns, online evaluators, topic classification. Use it for traces produced inside evaluation runs, where the dataset’s own judge already scores each case and a second judging pass would only double the bill. Leaving monitor unset keeps the engine’s normal behavior.
pattern_ids fully defines what’s checked when provided: only those named patterns run, the built-in checks are skipped. This mirrors how evaluation_settings_id fully defines an evaluation’s grading config rather than layering on top of a default. Omit pattern_ids (keep just monitor=True) to run the full default sweep instead.

Dashboard toggle: automatic, every trace from an agent

Enable monitoring once per agent in the dashboard, and every subsequent trace from that agent is checked automatically, with no monitor=True needed on any individual call.
  1. Send at least one trace. The first call to tracer.trace(...) for a given agent name auto-creates a reference agent in your workspace. See Tracing if you haven’t wired this up yet.
  2. Open Governance > Observe > Agents. Your SDK-traced agent appears in the agent list with an External badge, alongside any native agents.
  3. Turn on monitoring. Enable the agent’s monitoring profile and choose a coverage mode: sample a percentage of traffic, or check every trace.

What gets checked

Three separate streams classify a monitored trace: Operational outcomes - facts the trace itself recorded, always on, never configurable, and never raising triage signals (they feed the KPI failure metrics and Top failing instead): Latency is a distribution metric (Overview’s p95 card, straight from the traces), not a failure classification. Scorers - judgments you opt in to from the Scorers page, all off by default. Six built-in template scorers ship with the engine, all zero-LLM-cost; your own template patterns, LLM judge scorers, and custom endpoint scorers layer on top: Human feedback - your users’ votes via client.feedback.report(trace_id, "down"), raising a Negative user feedback signal directly (see User Feedback).
Metric semantics: operational outcomes and template/pattern hits classify the RUN (they move failureRate and the run-outcome breakdown); judge, code, and external scorer verdicts are evaluator events - they raise signals and keep per-scorer histories without reclassifying the run. See what moves which metric.

Scorer administration as code

Everything the Scorers page does is scriptable via client.monitor.scorers - enable the shipped templates, deploy code/external scorers, and read their check history:
Projects and trace read-back are first-class too: client.projects.create(name) returns an isolated project with its own apiKey (the per-run isolation pattern integration suites use), and client.traces.get(trace_id) / client.traces.list(cursor=...) read what the tracer wrote. Pattern scorers you author are rules matched against the response text or the trace: keyword/contains, regex, or an LLM-judged semantic rubric. Build them via the dashboard (Scorers → New scorerPattern scorer - see Patterns for the condition builder, AND/OR/NOR combination, and match targets) or with client.monitor.patterns.builder(...), shown below.
The “Tool/action failure” check reads the success: false a recorded tool call carries. The easiest way to produce that is tracer.trace_tool_call(...), which captures an escaping exception as a failed call automatically - see Tracing.
A trace that matches nothing becomes a healthy “info” tally instead, which powers the agent’s health-rate percentage.

client.monitor.patterns

builder() parameters

publish() returns a pattern with .id, which you pass in pattern_ids at trace time.
On the hosted platform, creating a pattern requires a Business or Enterprise plan (the same entitlement gate as the dashboard’s Patterns UI). Self-host has no plan gates.

Where signals show up

Matches are deduped by pattern and (usually) by agent, so a recurring issue accumulates occurrences on one signal instead of creating a new row every time. Each signal links back to the trace and tool calls that produced it, so a reviewer can open the exact exchange from the dashboard (Governance > Observe), or read it straight from the SDK.

client.monitor.signals

Read-only: a signal is the system’s output from checking traces against patterns, not something you create directly.

list() parameters

list()/get() both return a signal with .id, .type, .severity, .polarity, .status, .summary, .pattern_key, .occurrence_count, .occurrences, .recommended_actions, .root_cause, and more, matching the fields shown in the dashboard’s triage queue.

client.monitor.profile

Get/update one agent’s Monitor coverage settings: coverage mode, sample rate, retention, redaction, and approval policy. Legacy threshold_overrides fields still round-trip for wire compatibility, but latency is a KPI metric now (Overview’s p95 card, straight from the traces) rather than a detection threshold.
get() returns None when the agent has never been configured (still on platform defaults). update() upserts and only changes the fields you pass:

Self-host extras

A self-hosted instance adds two Monitor surfaces the hosted platform doesn’t have yet, both reachable from this same SDK:
  • Online evaluators (client.monitor.online_evaluators) - a real LLM judge scoring a sample of live traffic continuously, per trace or per whole session (scope="session", judged automatically once the conversation goes idle). See Online evaluators.
  • Outcome reports and user feedback (client.outcomes.report(...) / client.feedback.report(...)) - record what actually happened after the fact (a reopened ticket, an end user’s thumbs-down) against a trace; negative feedback raises a signal directly, and both streams feed the dashboard’s Judge Calibration card. See Outcomes & Judge Calibration.

Tracing

Send the traces this feature monitors

Patterns

The condition builder, match targets, and where signals go